Introduction
The MIT educational experience is like a series of âah-ha!â revelations that students build into an arsenal for attacking problemsâand it will happen to you no matter what you major in. Everyoneâthis includes philosophy majors as well as physics majorsâmust take a year of calculus, a year of physics, a term of chemistry and a term of biology. There are other institute-level requirements (such as eight humanities, arts, or social science classes and a laboratory course) but itâs really the science core that sets a quantitative ability standard for all undergraduates. This standard makes MIT students extremely attractive to graduate schools, professional schools, and potential employers. And it provides for an unusual sense of communityâhow many other schools can you name where everyone is able to solve a reasonably complex kinematics problem?
This doesnât mean that the only people who belong at MIT are mathematicians, physicists, and engineers. Quantitative thinkers donât necessarily manipulate equations for a living, and thereâs certainly a need for more of them in policy-making positions. John Deutch, an MIT alumnus and professor, lamented the lack of technical literacy in the higher levels of government during his tenure as Director of the CIA:
…probably two people in the Cabinet could solve quadratic equations. If you include deputies, you might have four. And three of them will have gone to MIT.
If youâre still trying to figure out whether MIT is the place for you, consider the following two questions: Does âfuzzy thinkingâ bother you? Do you want to learn how to critically assess problems in whatever discipline interests you (whether itâs mechanical engineering or political science)? If you can answer both with an enthusiastic âYes!â then thereâs no better place for you academically than MIT.